Beyond the Law’s Ends: Files, Bureaucracy and Legal Knowledge
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Files, memoranda, and paperwork in general, are seen as routine instruments of bureaucratic practice, the means for achieving an end: the legal decision. Consequently, the analysis tends to focus on the ‘results’ of institutional acts but not on the process of institutionalization that files entail. Therefore law is apprehended by its ends and the legal analysis is kept within the epistemological boundaries of the same ends. In this essay, I propose to bring attention to legal files as analytical objects in their own terms. To do so, I elaborate, in the ethnographic mode, on my personal file as it unfolded in my fieldwork in the Argentine Supreme Court from August 2005 to February 2007. In looking at the file as an artifact of knowledge, I seek to bring to the surface aspects of lawmaking that remain a blind spot of socio-legal studies.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
References
Barrera, Leticia (2009). Performing the Court: Forms and Practices of Legal Knoweldge-
Making in Argentina. USA: Cornell University
–––––––– (2008). “Files Circulation and the Forms of Legal Experts: Agency and
Personhood in the Argentine Supreme Court”. En Journal of Legal Anthropology
Vol. 1 Nº 1:3-24
Bourdieu, Pierre (1987). “The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field”. En Hastings Law Review Vol. 38: 805-53
Cassagne, Juan Carlos (2006). Derecho Administrativo Tomo 1.
Buenos Aires: LexisNexis - Abeledo-Perrot
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación Argentina (1942). “Corporación de Transportes de
la Ciudad de Buenos Aires v. Compañía de ómnibus Ciudad de Buenos Aires”. En
Fallos Nº 194: 220-1.
Dauber, Kenneth (1995). “Bureaucratizing the Ethnographer’s Magic”. En Current
Anthropology Vol. 36 Nº 1:5-95
Durkheim, Émile (1933). The division of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press.
Fluerh-Lobban, Carolyn (2003). Ethics and the Profession of Anthropology. Walnut Creek,
CA: AltaMira Press. Citado enShannon, Jennifer (2007). “Informed Consent: The Political and Legal Anthropology Review Vol.30 Nº 2:229-248
Foucault, Michel (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin
Ginsburg, Carlo (1999).The Judge and the Historian: Marginal Notes on a Late-
Twentienth-Century Miscarriage of Justice. New York: Verso.
Goldstein, Abraham S. (1969). “Legal Control of the Dossier”. En On Record: Files and
Dossiers in American Life Stanton Wheeler (Ed.). New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Goody, Jack (1986). The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society. New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Gordillo, Agustín (2003). Tratado de Derecho Administrativo Tomo 1. Buenos Aires:
FDA.
Hegel-Cantarella, Christine (2011). “Kin-to-Be: Betrothal, Legal Documents, and
Reconfiguring Relational Obligations in Egypt”. En Law, Culture and the Humanities. Visita 7 de julio de 2011 en http://lch.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/02/21/1743872110383354
Hodder, Ian (2000).“The Interpretation of Documents and Material Culture”. En Handbook
of Qualitative Research, Second Edition, 703-15, Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.) Thousand Oaks California: Sage Publications.
Jacob, Marie-Andrée (2007). “Form-made Persons: Consent Forms as Consent’s Blind
Spot”. En The Political and Legal Anthropology Review Vol.30 Nº 2: 249-268.
Jeanneret de Pérez Cortés, Maria C. (2001/2002). “El control judicial de la función
administrativa de los poderes Legislativo y Judicial” En El Derecho Tomo 2001/2002: 678-694.
Latour, Bruno (2005). Reassembling the Social, An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory .
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
–––––––– (2004) La Fabrique Du Droit. Une Ethnographie du Conseil d’État. Paris: La
Découverte /Poche.
Latour, Bruno (1999). Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies.
Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Leach, James (2004). “Modes of Creativity”. En Transactions and Creations: Property Debates and the Stimulus of Melanesia Erich Hirsch and Marilyn Strathern (Eds.). Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Lederman, Rena (2007). “Comparative ‘Research’: A Modest Proposal Concerning the Object of Ethics Regulation”. En The Political and Legal Anthropology Review Vol.30 Nº 2: 305-327.
Levi, Ron and Mariana Valverde (2008). “Studying Law by Association: Bruno Latour
Goes to the Conseild’État”. En Law and Social Inquiry Vol.33 Nº 3: 805-25.
Marienhoff, Miguel (1990). Tratado de Derecho Administrativo, Tomo 1. Buenos Aires:
Abeledo Perrot
Maurer, Bill (2002). “Anthropological and Accounting Knowledge in Islamic Banking and
Finance. Rethinking Critical Accounts”. En Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute Vol. 8: 645-667.
Meyler, Bernadette (2008). “Daniel Defoe and the Written Constitution”. En Cornell Law
Review Vol. 94 Nº 1: 73-132.
Miyazaki, Hirokazu (2000). “Faith and its Fulfillment: Agency, Exchange, and the Fijian
Aesthetics of Completion”. En American Ethnologist Vol. 27 Nº 1: 31-51.
Pound, Roscoe (1910). “Law in the Books and Law in Action” En American Law Review
Vol. 44: 12-36.
Reed, Adam (2006) “Documents Unfolding”. En Documents: Artifacts of Modern
Knowledge Annelise Riles (Ed.). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press
Riles, Annelise (En prensa). Collateral Knowledge: Legal Reason in the
Global Financial Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
–––––––– (2008). “The Anti-Network: Global Private Law, Legal Knowledge, and the Legitimacy of the State". En American Journal of Comparative Law Vol. 56: 605-630.
–––––––– (2006a). “Introduction: In Response.” En Documents: Artifacts of Modern
Knowledge Annelise Riles (Ed.). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press
–––––––– (2006b). “[Deadlines]: Removing the Brackets on Politics in Bureaucratic and
Anthropological Analysis”. En Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge
Annelise Riles (Ed.). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press
–––––––– (2005). "A New Agenda for the Cultural Study of Law: Taking on the
Technicalities". En Buffalo Law Review Vol. 53: 973-1033.
–––––––– (2004). “Real Time: Unwinding Technocratic and Anthropological Knowledge”.
En American Ethnologist Vol. 31 Nº 3: 392-405.
–––––––– (2001). The Network Inside Out. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Shannon, Jennifer (2007). “Informed Consent: Documenting the Intersection of
Bureaucratic Regulation and Ethnographic Practice”. En The Political and Legal Anthropology Review Vol. 30 Nº 2: 229-248.
Silbey, Susan (2005). “After Legal Consciousness”. En Annual Review of Law and Social
Sciences Vol.1: 323-68.
Strathern, Marilyn (2000). Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability,
Ethics and the Academy. London: Routledge.
–––––––– (1999). Property, Substance and Effect, Property, Substance and Effect:
Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things. London & New Brunswick NJ: The Athlone Press.
Strauss, Peter L. (2002). Administrative Justice in the United States. Durham, NC,
Carolina: Academic Press.
Strauss, Peter L., Todd D. Rakoff and Cynthia R. Farina (2003). Administrative Law, Cases
and Comments. New York: Foundation Press
Swiffen, Amy (2007). “Research and Moral Law: Ethics and the Social Science Relation” En The Politica land Legal Anthropology Review. Vol. 30 Nº 2: 210-228.
Simmel, Georg (1971). On Individuality and Social Forms. Donald N. Levine (Ed.).
Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Valverde, Mariana (2008). “The Ethic of Urban Diversity: Local Law and the Negotiation
of Urban Norms”. En Law and Social Inquiry. Vol. 33 Issue 4: 895-23
Visman, Cornellia (2008). Files: Law and Media Technology. Stanford, CA: Stanford
University Press.
Weber, Max (1968). “Bureaucracy: On Charisma and Institution Building”. En Selected
Papers. Shmuel N. Eisenstadt (Ed.) Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Yngvesson, Barbara and Susan Bibler Coutin (2006). “Backed by Papers: Undoing Persons, Histories, and Return”. En American Ethnologist Vol. 33 Nº 2: 177-190.
Yngvesson, Barbara (1998). Virtuous Citizens, Disruptive Subjects, Order and Complaint
in a New England Court. New York: Routledge.
Yablon, Charles M. (1990). “Forms”. En Cardozo Law Review Vol.11 Nº 5: 1349-1353.
